CWP-29966-2018 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Karnail Singh & others State of Punjab & CORAM: Present: - NAMIT KUMAR 1. by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of anomaly created in t Rs.10300-34800/ extended to categories that were drawing a lower pay scale. further pray for revision of their pay scales at par wi situated employees from the due date including interest thereon, Commission, employees. 2018 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Karnail Singh & others Versus State of Punjab & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate, Mr. N.P.S.Hira, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Anupam Singla and Ms. Deepika Bagri, Advocates, for respondents No.3 & 4. KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to remove the ly created in their pay scales and to grant them revised 34800/- with Grade Pay of Rs.3200/ extended to categories that were drawing a lower pay scale. further pray for revision of their pay scales at par wi situated employees from the due date with all consequential benefits including interest thereon, pursuant to the , which have already been extended IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29966-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 …Petitioners …Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. and Ms. Deepika Bagri, Advocates, invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of mandamus directing the respondents to remove the to grant them revised pay scale of with Grade Pay of Rs.3200/-, which has already been extended to categories that were drawing a lower pay scale. The petitioners further pray for revision of their pay scales at par with other similarly with all consequential benefits pursuant to the recommendations of the Pay ve already been extended to the similarly situated invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of mandamus directing the respondents to remove the pay scale of been The petitioners th other similarly with all consequential benefits recommendations of the Pay to the similarly situated VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-29966-2018 (O&M) 2. CWP-29966-2018 (O&M) 2. petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP-7920-2013 titled ‘ others’ decided on Bench in LPA Singh & others Singh’s case 28742-2013 titled ‘ decided on 10.12.2018, which Bench in LPA Singh & others 3. in the same terms as in 07.07.2026 Vimal 2018 (O&M) (2) Learned counsel for the parties are petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in 2013 titled ‘Manmohan Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab & decided on 01.02.2018, which has been uph in LPA-449-2019 titled ‘State of Punjab & others Vs. Manmohan Singh & others’ decided on 09.03.2026. Singh’s case (supra) [CWP-7920-2013] has 2013 titled ‘Karamjit Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab & others decided on 10.12.2018, which in turn has also been upheld by Bench in LPA-1735-2019 titled ‘State of Punjab & others Vs. Karamjit Singh & others’ decided on 25.05.2026. In view of the aforesaid position, the present petition is allowed in the same terms as in Manmohan Singh’s case (supra) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in Manmohan Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab & 01.02.2018, which has been upheld by the Division State of Punjab & others Vs. Manmohan The judgment in Manmohan has also been followed in CWP- others Vs. State of Punjab & others’ has also been upheld by the Division State of Punjab & others Vs. Karamjit In view of the aforesaid position, the present petition is allowed Manmohan Singh’s case (supra) [CWP-7920-2013]. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in Manmohan Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab & by the Division State of Punjab & others Vs. Manmohan Manmohan - ’ Division State of Punjab & others Vs. Karamjit In view of the aforesaid position, the present petition is allowed VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.