319 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KULWANT SINGH AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. V.G. Jau Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, 1. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the Award dated 24.08.2018 (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Reference Court’). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 25.02.2026 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, lead case of which was 2017, titled “Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) Versus Jasvir Singh Dhaliwal and others notification under Section 4 of the as ‘the Act’) was assessed @ Rs.4,15,59,750/ 3. Learned counsel for the respondents are controvert the above factual position. 4. After going through the judgment referred to above as well as the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion made by the learned counsel for the appellants. 5. Consequently, the pres terms as Jasvir Singh Dhaliwal’s case entitled to market value @ Rs.4,15,59,750/ statutory benefits under the Act. 6. All pending application(s) 27.05.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus KULWANT SINGH AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. V.G. Jauhar, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the Award 24.08.2018 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, SAS Nagar (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Reference Court’). At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 25.02.2026 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, lead case of which was “Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) Versus Jasvir Singh Dhaliwal and others” whereby the market value on the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to was assessed @ Rs.4,15,59,750/- per acre. Learned counsel for the respondents are controvert the above factual position. After going through the judgment referred to above as well as the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion made by the learned counsel for the appellants. Consequently, the present appeal Jasvir Singh Dhaliwal’s case (supra) and the landowners are held entitled to market value @ Rs.4,15,59,750/- per acre besides granting all other statutory benefits under the Act. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-3348-2019 Date of Decision: May 27, 2026 GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ....Appellant ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA har, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the Award passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, SAS Nagar (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Reference Court’). At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 25.02.2026 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, lead case of which was RFA-1172- “Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) Versus whereby the market value on the date of Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to per acre. Learned counsel for the respondents are not in a position to After going through the judgment referred to above as well as the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion made by the learned ent appeal is disposed of in the same (supra) and the landowners are held per acre besides granting all other , if any, shall also stand disposed of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2019 May 27, 2026 By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the Award passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, SAS Nagar that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 25.02.2026 - “Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) Versus whereby the market value on the date of Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to not in a position to After going through the judgment referred to above as well as the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion made by the learned disposed of in the same (supra) and the landowners are held per acre besides granting all other TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.05.29 18:40 I agree to specified portions of this document