Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2018 DAILYLAW 533 (UTT)

SMT. NEEMA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2336/2018 · 2026-07-17

Alok Mahra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010206592018 WPCRL/2336/2018 Smt. Neema Devi --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Rohan Koranga proxy counsel for Mr. Ashok Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the relief sought in the writ petition no longer survives and the petition has consequently become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the criminal writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Alok Mahra, J.) 17-07-2026 mamta