Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2018 DAILYLAW 525 (UTT)

BEENITA JEENA v. THE REGISTRAR KUMAUN UNIVERSITY NAINITAL

WPMS/2843/2018 · 2026-03-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2843 of 2018 Beenita Jeena …………Petitioner Vs. The Registrar Kumaun University Nainital and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Devesh Upreti, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. There is no representation for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that the grievance which has been raised by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, has now been redressed; therefore there is no use of keeping this writ petition pending. 4. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.03.2026 SK