Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 5231 (PNJ)

DEEPAK MADHOK AND OTHERS v. NEHA MADHOK @ NEHA BHASIN

COCP/1990/2023 · 2026-03-12

Nidhi Gupta

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 206 Deepak M Neha Mad CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU CM-5879 reply on be and the rep COCP-199 violation of by a Co-or 222-2018 t COCP-1990-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1990 o Date of decision ak Madhok and others Versus Madhok @ Neha Bhasin AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate Mr. Sayyam Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate w Ms. Kritika Singh, Advocate a Mr. Rohit Dhankar, Advocate for the respondent. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) 5879-CII-2024 Prayer in this application is on behalf of respondent. The application is allowed su he reply on behalf of respondent is tak 1990-2023 The present contempt petitio tion of the interim order dated 11.01.2 ordinate Bench of this Court in C 2018 titled as “Deepak Madhok and o 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1990 of 2023 (O & M) cision :-12.03.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ocate with ocate cate with ocate and ocate ion is for placing on record the ed subject to all just exceptions is taken on record. petition has been filed alleging 1.01.2023 (Annexure P-3) passed rt in CRM-557-2023 in CRM-M- and others vs. State of Punjab”, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.13 19.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document whereby th beyond 16. direction w P-6), wher adjourn the is further s (Annexure petitioners hearing, wh to the pet violation of respondent reply dated tendered a compliance zimni orde learned tri directions i considerati the fact tha this Court passed in th COCP-1990-2023 (O & M) eby the learned trial Court was dire nd 16.03.2023. Learned counsel for the petiti tion was again reiterated vide order d hereby the interim order directing rn the case beyond the date fixed by t rther submitted that thereafter an ap exure P-4) was filed by the resp ioners to appear before the trial Court ng, which was entertained by the lear e petitioners, entertaining the said tion of the order passed by the Writ Co At this stage, learned co ndent has referred to the submissions dated 20.03.2024 to submit that th ered an unconditional apology. It is liance of the order passed by this Co i orders dated 27.03.2023 and there ed trial Court has been adjourned tions issued by this Court. In view of the aforesaid ideration the explanation furnished by act that the directions issued by this C Court is of the opinion that no further ed in the present contempt proceedings 2 s directed to adjourn the matter petitioners submits that the said rder dated 16.03.2023 (Annexure ecting the learned trial Court to ed by this Court was continued. It an application dated 03.02.2023 e respondent calling upon the Court on each and every date of he learned trial Court. According said application amounted to rit Court. d counsel appearing for the ssions made in paragraph 3 of the that the respondent has already . It is further submitted that in this Court, as is evident from the thereafter, the case before the ourned in accordance with the position and taking into hed by the respondent as well as this Court stand complied with, further direction is required to be edings. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.13 19.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document dismissed Pend March 12 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1990-2023 (O & M) Accordingly, the present c issed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall a 2, 2026 speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 sent contempt petition stands shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.13 19.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document