IN THE HIG 229 Mohinder Kaur Mohinder Sain BEFORE: HO Present: - Mr Mr NIDHI GUPTA 1. The concurrent judg joint possession Courts below. 2. The with an applicat appeal. 3. A p Court on 13.1 condonation of d issued for want week was grante process fee wa opportunity was fee. E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA Da Kaur& Ors. Versus ain Bedi & Ors. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI Mr. Rudresh, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Chatrath, Advocate for the UPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellants/defendants are t judgments and decrees of the learne ession filed by the respondents/plaint The present appeal is of the year pplication seeking condonation of 175 A perusal of the order sheets reveal 13.11.2018 issued notice of mot on of delay as well as in the main appe r want of process fee. Accordingly, granted to do the needful to the learne ee was not filed, therefore, again v ty was granted to the learned counsel ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4696-2018(O&M) Date of Decision:12.03.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondent IDHI GUPTA for the appellants. are in second appeal against th learned Courts below whereby suit fo /plaintiffs has been decreed by both th year 2018 and the same is accompanie of 175 days’ delay in filing the prese reveals that a Co-ordinate Bench of th f motion in the application seekin in appeal. However, notice could not b ingly, vide order dated 22.11.2019,on learned counsel for the appellants. Sti ain vide order dated 24.11.2023, la ounsel for the appellants to file proce s ndents nst the suit for both the panied present h of this seeking d not be one ts. Still 23, last process RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-4696-2018 4. Tod prays for time to 5. A b exhibited an utte be appreciated t affording oppor hand, the appel clear that neith pursuing the pre dismiss the sam 6. Ord 7. The 8. Pen 12.03.2026 amit Wh Wh 2018(O&M) Today again, learned proxy coun time to file the process fee. A bare reading of the above facts an utterly casual attitude in their pursu iated that very valuable public time o opportunities to the appellants in the appellants have adopted an utterly c t neither the appellantsnor their co the present matter. Thus, this Court is l e same for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. The present appeal is dismissed for Pending application(s), if any, shall Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No [2] counsel appearing for the appellan facts shows that the appellants ha pursuit of the present litigation. It is time of the Court has been expended in the interest of justice. On the oth ly casual and careless approach.It counsel areseriously interested urt is left with no other option except ed for non-prosecution. , shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHIGUPTA ) JUDGE pellants have . It is to nded in he other It is sted in xcept to RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.