Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2018 DAILYLAW 518 (UTT)

SMT. URMILA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3103/2018 · 2026-03-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.3103 of 2018 Smt. Urmila Devi …………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned S.C. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, due to efflux of time. 4. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 24.03.2026 SK 2