Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 5125 (PNJ)

ESTATE OFFICER HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS v. JAI KISHAN

CR/7188/2018 · 2026-04-30

Nidhi Gupta

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-7188-20 IN THE HIG 233-B Estate Office Jai Kishan CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. orders dated P-11, respec Division)-cu have been is 2. judgment of Developmen ID # 27504 grant of plot advertisemen 3. in the presen Oustee Quot 2018 -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA Officer, Haryana Urban Development Versus M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for t Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Senior Ad Mr. Siddheshwar Hans, Advoca I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has be dated 25.09.2018, 05.10.2018 and respectively) passed by the learned A cum-Executing Court, Kaithal, wh een issued against the petitioners/JDs. Learned counsel for the pet ent of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Es ment Authority and others vs. Nir 50426 to submit that it is mandate of plot under the Oustee Quota has to isement. Learned Senior Counsel for the present case, the respondent had appli e Quota only after the issuance of adve D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-7188-2018 Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 pment Authority and others .…Petitioners ....Respondent NIDHI GUPTA te for the petitioners. ior Advocate with dvocate for the respondent. has been filed for setting aside the and 12.10.2018 (Annexures P-9 to rned Additional Civil Judge (Senior al, whereby fresh warrants of arrest s/JDs. e petitioners has relied upon a Estate Officer, Haryana Urban . Nirmala Devi: Law Finder Doc andated therein that application for has to be made before issuance of for the respondent fairly admits that d applied for grant of plot under the f advertisement by the petitioners. the 9 to nior rrest n a an oc for e of that r the RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-7188-20 4. 5. the parties a in Nirmala D and the imp (Annexures petitioners h 6. 30.04.2026 rishu 2018 -2- Heard. In view of the afore-noted subm rties and also in view of law laid dow ala Devi’s case (supra), the present e impugned orders dated 25.09.2018 xures P-9 to P-11, respectively) ar ners herein. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable d submissions of learned counsel for d down by the Hon’ble Apex Court resent revision petition is allowed; 9.2018, 05.10.2018 and 12.10.2018 ly) are hereby set aside qua the any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No l for ourt ed; 018 the RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.