RAJ KARAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CR/614/2025 · 2026-01-13
Nidhi Gupta
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 5114 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 5114 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 139+141
Raj Karan
State of Ha
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
CM-23814
the demarc land of sam
and the afo CR-614-20
the impugn learned Civ 945-2018 t has been he Civil Revision No.614 of 2025 (O & M IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
CM No.23814-C
Civil Revision N
Date of decision Karan and others ….. Versus of Haryana and others
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the applicants-petitioners
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) 23814-CII-2015
Prayer in this application is fo emarcation/measurement report dated of same vicinity by learned A.C.IInd G
The application is allowed su he aforesaid document is taken on rec 2025
Prayer in the present revision mpugned Order dated 18.11.2024 (an ed Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Yamuna N 2018 titled as “Raj Karan vs. State o een held by the learned trial Court tha
& M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH CII-2025 in/and ion No.614 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-13.01.2026 …..Applicants-Petitioners …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate s. dl. A.G., Haryana. n is for placing on record copy of t dated 30.12.2023 of Abadi Deh .IInd Grade as Annexure P- 13. ed subject to all just exceptions on record as Annexure P-13. vision petition is for setting aside 24 (annexure P-9) passed by the una Nagar in Civil Suit No.CS- tate of Haryana etc.” whereby it urt that the demarcation could not VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
be conduct whereby t stands dism
submits th infructuous Court, ther been rende
January 1 Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
Civil Revision No.614 of 2025 (O & M onducted; and impugned order dated eby the application for review of th s dismissed.
At the very outset, learned its that the present revision pet ctuous as the main suit has been de t, therefore this revision petition may rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, ary 13, 2026
speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
& M) 2 dated 08.1.2025 (annexure P-12) of the order dated 18.11.2024 arned counsel for the petitioner n petition has been rendered een decided by the learned trial n may be disposed of as having if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document