MOHAN SINGH BISHT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY EXCISE GOVERNMENT OF UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN
WPMS/2409/2018 · 2026-03-12
Pankaj Purohit
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 510 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 510 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.2409 of 2018 Mohan Singh Bisht
…………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Shivanand Bhatt,
learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned S.C. for the State. Withdrawal Application (CLMA No.13056 of 2018)
3. Today the matter is listed on a withdrawal application.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the writ petition for the reason that the writ petition has rendered infructuous due to efflux of time.
5.
Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. 6+. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
12.03.2026 SK