107 IN TH Dilbagh Sin The Collecto Punjab and CORAM: Present: HARKESH appellant judgment Civil Appe another Departmen of Rs. 46,82 [2] the above fa [3] Supreme C IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA Date h Singh Versus ollector Land Acquisition, Industries D b and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advoc Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advoca for the appellant. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional for respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4. None for respondent No. 2-Un **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned Senior lant submits that the present appeal ent dated 27.06.2018 passed by the ppeal No(s). 9067-9082 of 2013 r Versus Land Acquisition ment and another, while awarding 46,829/- per acre alongwith statutory Learned State Counsel is no ove factual position. After going through the judgm me Court referred to above as well UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 3024 of 1998 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2026 ...Appellant tries Department, ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate, assisted by dvocate ional Advocate General, Punjab . Union of India. enior Counsel representing the ppeal is squarely covered by the y the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 13, titled “Charan Singh and tion Collector, Industries arding compensation to the tune tutory benefits. not in a position to controvert judgment passed by the Hon’ble s well as the present case, this DINESH KUMAR 2026.01.13 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
        -2-     Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for the appellant. [4] Consequently, the present appeal is disposed off in the same terms as Charan Singh’s case (supra). [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off.
January 13, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) ‘dk kamra’ JUDGE


    
    DINESH KUMAR 2026.01.13 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document