RSA-1115- IN THE HIG 210 Sucha Singh Jagir Singh a CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. against the District Cou No. 1/plaint peaceful pos been decreed suit land. 2. appeal was i Thereafter, t account of n 23.01.2018 15.02.2025 3. appellants an -2014 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Singh and others Versus ingh and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Defendants No. 1 to 3/appellan t the concurrent judgments and de t Courts whereby suit for permanent i /plaintiff for restraining the defenda ul possession of respondent No. 1-pl ecreed as, the plaintiff was able to p The matter pertains to the year was issued by the Predecessor Bench after, the matter was repeatedly adjour nt of non-appearance on behalf of th 2018, 30.01.2019, 05.09.2019, 12 2025. On 12.03.2020, none had a ants and the case was adjourned to 24 ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1115-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.03.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA pellants herein are in second appeal nd decrees rendered by both the anent injunction filed by respondent fendants from interfering into the plaintiff over the suit land has le to prove his possession over the e year 2014 and notice in the main Bench vide order dated 03.12.2015. adjourned either at the request or on f of the appellants on 02.05.2016, , 12.03.2020, 20.07.2023 and had appeared on behalf of the to 24.08.2020, while also directing peal the dent the has the ain r on 016, and the ting RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.06 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1115- learned coun the LRs of needful has n the needful appearance called twice. 4. have exhibit litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Thus, this Co non-prosecu 5. 6. 06.03.2026 rishu -2014 (O&M) -2- d counsel for the appellants to take n Rs of deceased-respondent No. 2. B l has not been done till date; despite g edful vide order dated 20.07.2023. T rance on behalf of the appellants, d twice. A bare reading of the above exhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th casual and careless approach. It is cl counsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other option e rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable take necessary steps for impleading . But as per office report, the spite grant of last opportunity to do 023. Today again, none has put in nts, despite the case having been facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. ption except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ding the o do t in een sent the in d an for RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.06 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.