GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, PUDA BHAWAN v. SAJJAN AND ORS.
RFA/6318/2018 · 2026-02-25
Harkesh Manuja
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 4971 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 4971 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.6318 of 2018(O&M)
with XOBJR-63-2021(O&M) Date of Decision:-25.02.2026
......Appellant
V/s Sajjan and others @ Gurjit Kaur …...Respondents Coram:-Hon'ble Mr. Harkesh Manuja
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
CM-2754-C1-202
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The name of applicant/respondent No.1 shall be read as “Sajjan @ Gurjit Kaur instead of “Sajjan”. Main Case
PAWAN KUMAR 2026.03.17 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
(HARKESH MANUJA) 25.02.2026 JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAWAN KUMAR 2026.03.17 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document