Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 4945 (PNJ)

JAGIR SINGH v. SHO P.S. SADAR FEROZEPUR AND OTHERS

RSA/4314/2019 · 2026-01-30

Nidhi Gupta

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-4314- IN THE HIG 209 Jagir Singh SHO, PS Sad CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. reversal date Freozepur, w herein was 1710.2018, injunction fil 2. appeal is yet the inception times, out o 11.02.2020, appeal was a behalf of lea un-represent -2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o ingh Versus PS Sadar Freozepur and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellant. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/plaintiff in second ap al dated 19.07.2019 passed by the lear , whereby the appeal filed by defe was allowed, setting aside the j , passed by the learned trial Co filed by the plaintiff/appellant was The matter pertains to the year l is yet to be issued. Perusal of the ord ception of the present appeal, the sam out of which on 05 dates of hearing 2020, 19.03.2020 and 19.07.2023 (las l was adjourned either at the request of f learned counsel for the appellant. T resented, despite the case having been ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4314-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA AAG, Punjab. ond appeal against the judgment of e learned Additional District Judge, defendant/respondents No. 1 to 4 the judgment and decree dated rial Court; and suit for permanent nt was dismissed. e year 2019 and notice in the main he order-sheet(s) reveal(s) that since the same was listed for hearing 09 earing i.e. 19.09.2019, 10.12.2019, 23 (last date of hearing) the present uest of, or due to non-appearance on llant. Today, the appellant had gone g been called twice. t of dge, ated nent ain ince 09 019, sent e on one RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.05 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-4314- 3. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is lef non-prosecu 4. 5. 30.01.2026 rishu -2019 (O&M) -2- A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option excep rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his uing the present matter. Thus, this except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No llant sent the the ly his this for RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.05 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.