RSA-1801- IN THE HIG 229 Sohrab and o Sahid CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby the injunction w 2. re-filed with said applica 12.10.2018 issued. Perus aforesaid ap repeatedly ad account of n 29.08.2019, 20.08.2025 -2017 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o b and others Versus M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellants. Mr. Rajesh Narang, Advocate fo I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/plaintiffs are in s rrent judgments and decrees rendered their suit for declaration with cons was dismissed. The present second appeal is o d with a delay of 532 days (CM-437 pplication was issued by the Predece 2018. However, notice in the main Perusal of the case file reveals that a aid application for condonation of edly adjourned most of the times at th nt of non-appearance or due to chang 2019, 03.03.2023, 16.05.2023, 21 2025. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1801-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA cate for the respondent. in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts h consequential relief of permanent al is of the year 2017 and has been 4379-C-2017); and notice in the redecessor Bench vide order dated main second appeal is yet to be s that after issuance of notice in the n of delay, the matter has been s at the oral/written request(s) or on change of counsel on 28.05.2019, 3, 21.11.2023, 13.03.2024 and the urts nent een the ated be the een r on 019, and RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.30 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1801- 3. appellants, d 4. have exhibit litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Thus, this Co non-prosecu 5. 6. 29.04.2026 rishu -2017 (O&M) -2- Today again, none has put in ants, despite the case having been calle A bare reading of the above fa exhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th casual and careless approach. It is cl counsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other option e rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable put in appearance on behalf of the lled twice. ove facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. ption except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the sent the in d an for RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.30 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.