IN TH 108 Chetan Ga Rajinder K CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU the defend decrees of by the plai Courts belo be issued in been listed on two dat for the app i.e. 14.2.2 proxy coun and on fo RSA-6061-2018 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.6 Date of decision :-06.02.2025 an Gaur and others Versus nder Kumar Gaur and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellants. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present regular second ap defendants/appellants against the c ees of both the Courts below whereby e plaintiffs (respondents herein) has ts below. The matter pertains to the yea sued in the same. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) s listed as many as 11 times before this o dates i.e. 09.2.2023 and 24.1.2024 he appellants appeared and sought ad 14.2.2019, 23.8.2023, 21.11.2023, 0 y counsel for the appellants appeared on four dates i.e. 17.10.2019, 26 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH l No.6061 of 2018 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ond appeal has been preferred by the concurrent judgments and hereby the suit for partition filed n) has been decreed by both the he year 2018 and notice is yet to eet(s) shows that the appeal has re this Court, out of which only .1.2024 learned arguing counsel ght adjournments; on five dates 023, 07.5.2024 and 07.1.2025 eared and sought adjournments; 19, 26.2.2020, 02.9.2024 and VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.06 18.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 15.1.2025 t today there appellants their pursu valuable p opportuniti the other h careless ap their couns Thus, this same for no February 0 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-6061-2018 (O & M) .2025 there was no representation on b there is no representation on behalf o A bare reading of the abo llants have exhibited an utterly casu pursuit of the present litigation. It is able public time of the Court has be rtunities to the applicants-appellants in ther hand, the appellants have adop ess approach. It is clear that neither th counsel are seriously interested in pu , this Court is left with no other op for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, uary 06, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 n on behalf of appellants. Even ehalf of the appellants. e above facts shows that the y casual and derelict attitude in . It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording lants in the interest of justice. On e adopted an utterly casual and ither the applicants-appellants nor in pursuing the present matter. her option except to dismiss the if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.06 18.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document