CWP-18945 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (242) Tarsem Singh State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated (Annexure P the post of Earth Work Mistri, from the respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, vide order dated 20.04.2018 (Annexure P 2. record vernacular copy of order dated 10.08.2023, passed by t concerned, and apprises this Court that the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Earth Work Mistri, from the date when his juniors, i.e. respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, and therefore, the grievance of the petitioner raised throu 18945-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Tarsem Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. V.K. Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated (Annexure P-4), wherethrough, the claim of the petitioner the post of Earth Work Mistri, from the respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, vide order dated 20.04.2018 (Annexure P-2), was rejected. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State, has placed on record vernacular copy of order dated 10.08.2023, passed by t and apprises this Court that the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Earth Work Mistri, from the date when his juniors, i.e. respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, and therefore, the grievance of the petitioner raised through the instant writ petition now stands redressed. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18945-2019 Date of Decision : 23.04.2026 …Petitioner ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab. Through the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 22.03.2019 , wherethrough, the claim of the petitioner, for promotion to the post of Earth Work Mistri, from the date when his juniors, i.e. respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, vide order dated 20.04.2018 At the very outset, learned counsel for the State, has placed on record vernacular copy of order dated 10.08.2023, passed by the authorities and apprises this Court that the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Earth Work Mistri, from the date when his juniors, i.e. respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, and therefore, the grievance of the gh the instant writ petition now stands redressed. Through the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226 of the 22.03.2019 promotion to date when his juniors, i.e. respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, vide order dated 20.04.2018 At the very outset, learned counsel for the State, has placed on he authorities and apprises this Court that the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Earth Work Mistri, from the date when his juniors, i.e. respondents No.5 and 6 were promoted, and therefore, the grievance of the MANPREET SINGH 2026.04.24 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-18945 3. despite granting the promotion to the petitioner retrospectively, no monetary benefits have been released made debarring the petitioner to claim the monetary benefits. submits that in fact, the benefit of promotion has been denied illegally. Finally, he submits that he may be granted liberty to challenge the conditional promo 4. having been rendered infructuous 5. challenge the conditional promotional April 23, 202 Manpreet 18945-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that despite granting the promotion to the petitioner retrospectively, no monetary benefits have been released in his favour, made debarring the petitioner to claim the monetary benefits. submits that in fact, the benefit of promotion has been denied illegally. Finally, he submits that he may be granted liberty to challenge the conditional promotional order, by filing an apposite motion. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is having been rendered infructuous. However, the asked for liberty is afforded to the petitioner, to challenge the conditional promotional order (supra). 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that despite granting the promotion to the petitioner retrospectively, no monetary , rather, the promotion has been made debarring the petitioner to claim the monetary benefits. He further submits that in fact, the benefit of promotion has been denied illegally. Finally, he submits that he may be granted liberty to challenge the apposite motion. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as However, the asked for liberty is afforded to the petitioner, to order (supra). (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that despite granting the promotion to the petitioner retrospectively, no monetary the promotion has been He further submits that in fact, the benefit of promotion has been denied illegally. Finally, he submits that he may be granted liberty to challenge the disposed of as However, the asked for liberty is afforded to the petitioner, to MANPREET SINGH 2026.04.24 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment