Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 4886 (PNJ)

MANBIR v. JOGINDER AND ANOTHER

FAO/5463/2023 · 2026-04-17

Nidhi Gupta

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-5463 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 Manbir Joginder and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. injured against the dismissal of Accident Claims Tribunal, 26.10.2018 filed under Secti 2. issued in the same. Moreover, the present appeal has been filed with a delay of 791 days in filing and 112 days in re 3. case having been called twice. 4. has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant ha casual and careless approach. 5463-2023 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO Date of Decision: Versus Joginder and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/ against the dismissal of his claim petition by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jhajjar, vide impugned Award dated 26.10.2018, passed in MACT Case No. 181 of 2017 filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. The matter pertains to the year 2023 issued in the same. Moreover, the present appeal has been filed with a delay of 791 days in filing and 112 days in re Today, the appellant has gone un case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant ha casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5463-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.04.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA has been filed by the appellant/claimant/ claim petition by the learned Motor vide impugned Award dated 181 of 2017 dated 18.09.2017 A of the Motor Vehicles Act. The matter pertains to the year 2023 and notice is yet to be issued in the same. Moreover, the present appeal has been filed with a delay of 791 days in filing and 112 days in re-filing. Today, the appellant has gone un-represented, despite the facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in his pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant has adopted an utterly It is clear that neither the appellant nor his / claim petition by the learned Motor vide impugned Award dated and notice is yet to be issued in the same. Moreover, the present appeal has been filed with a represented, despite the pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the in the ly his RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.18 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-5463 counsel is Court is left with no other option except to prosecution 5. 6. 17.04.2026 rishu 5463-2023 (O&M) -2- seriously interested in pursuing the present matter left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 17.04.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non- Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Thus, this RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.18 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.