Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 4862 (MAD)

MR.KULANDAIVEL v. A.SUBRAMANI

SA/290/2018 · 2026-07-15

V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

__________ Page1 of 2 S.A.No.290 of 2018 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Orders were pronounced by this Court on 15.07.2026. The order has not been signed. Thereafter, it was brought to the notice of this Court that three Hon’ble Judges namely, the Hon’ble Mr.Justice N. Seshasayee, the Hon’ble Ms.Justice P.T.Asha and the Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel, have taken a different view holding that the deceased daughter cannot be treated as a coparcener and consequently, her legal heirs are not entitled to maintain a suit for partition by invoking the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession of Act. 2. Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran, learned counsel for the respondents states that on this very issue, a Division Bench of this Court consisting of the Hon’ble Mr.Justice N.Sathish Kumar and the Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.Jothiraman, have heard the members of the bar and have reserved orders on 16.07.2026. 3. Hence, post this appeal after two weeks awaiting the orders of the Division Bench. 4. List the matter on 03.08.2026 under the same caption ‘for being mentioned’. 20.07.2026 VKR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page2 of 2 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. vkr S.A.No.290 of 2018 20.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis