Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 4858 (PNJ)

SUKHJINDER SINGH v. ANIL KUMAR AND ORS

FAO/2664/2018 · 2026-01-28

Nidhi Gupta

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-2664 IN THE HIG 249 Sukhjinder S Anil Kumar CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seeks enhan him vide im Accident Cla Case No. 19 166 and 140 2. yet to be issu adjourned ei to non-appea with the pres condonation been filed. O gone un-repr for the appe 64-2018 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o inder Singh Versus umar and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present enhancement of compensation amou ide impugned Award dated 19.04.2 ent Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra in a 199 of 2012 dated 19.05.2015/20 d 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 The matter pertains to the year be issued in the same as, since the ince ned either at the request of learned co appearance on his behalf. Perusal of he present appeal an application bearin nation of delay of 213 days in filing iled. On the last date of hearing i.e. represented and last opportunity w e appellant to address arguments. To ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2664-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.01.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA resent appeal the injured-claimant amount of ₹2,22,203/- awarded to 9.04.2017, by the learned Motor a claim petition bearing MACT 15/20.05.2015 filed under Sections t, 1988. e year 2018 and notice of motion is he inception of appeal the same was ned counsel for the appellant or due sal of the record reveals that along bearing No. CM-9747-CII-2018 for filing the present appeal has also g i.e. 26.11.2019 the appellant had nity was granted to learned counsel Today, again none has put in to otor CT is was due long for also had nsel t in RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.29 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-2664 appearance o twice. 3. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left prosecution 4. 5. 28.01.2026 rishu 64-2018 (O&M) -2- rance on behalf of the appellant, despi A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha is seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable , despite the case having been called facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his suing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No lled sent the the ly this RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.29 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.