Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 4853 (PNJ)

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD v. HARJINDER SINGH AND ORS

FAO/4673/2018 · 2026-03-27

Harkesh Manuja

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-4673-2018 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ….Appellant Vs. HARJINDER SINGH 1. The date when the judgment was reserved 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 4. Whether only pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced. 5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment and reasons thereof. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Pradeep Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.1 HARKESH MANUJA, J. For orders, see Jagdish Singh and others 27.03.2026 sanjay Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? 2018 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ….Appellant Vs. HARJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ….Respondents The date when the judgment was reserved The date when the judgment is pronounced The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment and reasons thereof. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.1. ***** HARKESH MANUJA, J. For orders, see FAO-1651-2019, titled as Jagdish Singh and others, decided vide order of even date. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-4673-2018 (O&M) THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ….Appellant AND OTHERS ….Respondents 23.02.2026 27.03.2026 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 27.03.2026 operative part of the judgment is pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced. Full The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment Not applicable. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA titled as Harjinder singh Vs. , decided vide order of even date. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 Harjinder singh Vs. MOHMED ATIK 2026.03.27 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgmemtt