Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 4648 (MAD)

THIRUMURUGAN v. DHANAM

CMA/2563/2018 · 2026-03-05

C V Karthikeyan, K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMA No. 2563 of 2018 __________ Page1 of 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CMA No. 2563 of 2018 Thirumurugan ..Appellant Vs Dhanam ..Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act to set aside the fair and final order passed in FCHMOP.No.7/2017 dated 11/05/2018 on the file of the Family court at Ariyalur. For Appellant: Mr.M.Venkatesh for Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondent: M/s.G.Usha Raman JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) The Appeal has been filed by the petitioner in FCHMOP.No.7/2017 on the file of the Family court at Ariyalur, challenging the order dated 11.05.2018, by which order, the aforementioned FCHMOP No.7 of 2017 was dismissed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2563 of 2018 __________ Page2 of 7 2. The said petition was filed by the appellant herein seeking dissolution of the marriage, which had been conducted 09.11.2006 in the midnight at Kairlabath Police Station, Ariyalur Taluk as null and void under Section 12(1) (c) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court, Ariyalur dismissed the petition. Thereafter, the respondent had initiated proceedings seeking maintenance in M.C.No.11 of 2018 in the Family Court, Ariyalur. 3. It is brought to the notice of this court that pending such proceedings, the parties had arrived at a consensus that it would serve their interest if they live separately and the marriage is dissolved and in lieu thereof the respondent herein had received Rs.1,40,000/- as one time settlement and thereupon, the proceedings before the Family Court had been closed. Subsequent to such a development, a joint memo of compromise dated 17.12.2025 is presented before this court duly signed by the appellant and the respondent and their respective counsel. 4. The joint memo of compromise is as follows:- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2563 of 2018 __________ Page3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2563 of 2018 __________ Page4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2563 of 2018 __________ Page5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2563 of 2018 __________ Page6 of 7 5. Both the learned counsel are present and they had affirmed the aforesaid developments in the proceedings and sought for passing of necessary orders on the basis of the joint memo of compromise. 6. In view of the above, the order dated 11.05.2018 passed by the Family Court, Ariyalur in FCHMOP No.7 of 2017 is set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands allowed. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent dated 9.11.2006 stands dissolved. No order as to costs. (C.V.K.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 05-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssk To Judge, Family court at Ariyalur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2563 of 2018 __________ Page7 of 7 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. AND K.RAJASEKAR, J. ssk CMA No. 2563 of 2018 05-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis