IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:06.02.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.A.No.435 of 1994 C.Shanmugam ... Appellant/Plaintiff Vs. 1. Eswaramoorthy 2. Nalini 3. Thara 4. Kunjammal 5. Lakshmi 6. Ashok kumar 7. Prabhu 8. Senthilkumar 9. Minor Valarmathi 10. Rani Venkatachalapathi ... Respondents/Defendants Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and decree dated 30.09.1992 and made in A.S.No.39 of 1992 on the file of the Learned District Judge, Salem, Partly confirming the Judgment and decree dated 31.01.1992 and made in O.S.No.683 of 1983 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Salem. For Appellant : M/s.G.Jeremiah For R2 & R4 : Mr.Arul for R2 & R4. R5,R7 to R9 Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For R1 & R3 : Dismissed vide court order dated 30.06.2009 J U D G M E N T On 19.01.2018, learned counsel appearing for the appellant filed a memo stating that the appellant had taken change of vakalat from the counsel and the endorsement made by the appellant on the docket was also misplaced. Therefore, he prayed to issue notice to the appellant. Accordingly, notice was also issued to the appellant. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the appellant reported 'no instructions' from the appellant. In view of the memo and submission made by the learned counsel for appellant, the second appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gv To 1.The District Munsif, Salem. 2.The District Judge, Salem. Copy to:The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras 104.(2 copies) SV(CO) sm:28.3.2018 S.A.No.435 of 1994 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/