Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3768 (BOM)

FAIYAJ IQBAL AAGA v. AVINASH BHUPAL DHANAWADE AND ANR

REVN/438/2018 · 2026-09-17

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN. NO. 438 OF 2018 Faiyaj Iqbal Aaga … Applicant V/s. Avinash Bhupal Dhanawade And Anr … Respondents ________________________ Mr. Omkar Koratkar h/f. Mr. Balwant Salunkhe, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Nikhil Pawar a/w. Mr. Rajdeep Shitole, Advocate for respondent. _________________________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 P.C.: 1. The advocates appearing for the applicant - accused and respondent no. 1 - complainant have tendered consent terms dated 17 September 2026. They have identified the signatures of their respective clients on the consent terms and they also identify the presence of their client in this Court. The consent terms being tendered in the Court, the same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification purpose. 2. For ease of reference, the scan copy of the consent terms is reproduced hereinbelow :- 1/4 adn 16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx 2/4 adn 16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx 3/4 adn 16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx 3. The statements made in the consent terms are accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also accepted. 4. The Criminal Revision Application stands allowed in terms of the consent terms and prayer clause (b) stands allowed. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 4/4 adn