29-FA-1125-2018 (C).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1125 OF 2018 Mr. Karsondas Khimji Rajgor … Appellant Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6663 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1125 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3923 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1125 OF 2018 __ None for the Appellant __ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. 1. On the previous occasion the Court had passed the following order:- “1. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant has today explained his absence on the previous occasion. The explanation offered by him is acceptable. He then prays for an extension of time to comply with the Order dated 5th February, 2026. He submits that the Order could not be complied with as the certified copy thereof was not available. 2. At his request, time is extended for a period of four weeks from today. 3. Stand over to 18th September, 2026.” Basavraj Page|1 BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Date: 2026.09.19 13:06:04 +0530 29-FA-1125-2018 (C).DOC 2. Today, none appeared on behalf of the Appellant. It is clear, therefore, that the Appellant is not desirous of prosecuting the First Appeal. The same is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Interim Application, if any, shall stand dismissed. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Basavraj Page|2