sg 34.revn338-18.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Revision Application No.338 of 2018 Kausar Yunus Shaikh … Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents ---- None for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for Respondent No.1/ State. None for Respondent No.2. ---- Coram: Ashish S. Chavan, J. Date: 16th September, 2026. P.C.: 1. By way of this revision application, the Applicant has assailed the order dated 7th May, 2018 passed by the Sessions Court, Mumbai. The Applicant is the original complainant at whose instance a prosecution was filed by the Nagpada Police Station, Mumbai, under Section 376, 328 of IPC and Section 66(1) of I.T. Act, 2000 wherein Respondent No.2 was arraigned as the accused. The Applicant had preferred an application for further investigation under Section 178(3) of the Cr.P.C. Being aggrieved by the order dated 7th May, 2018 passed __________________________________________________ 16th September, 2026 SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Date: 2026.09.17 18:48:13 +0530 sg 34.revn338-18.docx by the Sessions Court, Mumbai (impugned order) whereby the application came to be dismissed, she has approached this Court. 2. Although the application is filed in the year 2018, on 10th March, 2021, when the application was listed before this Court, none appeared for the Applicant, and hence, the matter was adjourned. Even thereafter, neither the Applicant nor her Counsel has taken any efforts to circulate the matter or to obtain any reliefs as prayed for. From the conduct of the Applicant it is evident that she does not wish to prosecute the revision application. Hence, the revision application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Ashish S. Chavan, J.) __________________________________________________ 16th September, 2026