JITENDRA CHHAGANLAL SHAH v. DAKSHA JITENDRA SHAH AND ANR.
APPR/209/2018 · 2026-09-16
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3750 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3750 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
sg 28.revn200-18.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No.200 of 2018 With Criminal Application No. 209 of 2018 In Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No.200 of 2018 Jitendra Chhaganlal Shah … Applicant versus Daksha Jitendra Shah And Anr. … Respondents With Criminal Application No. 327 of 2018 In Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No.200 of 2018 Shalaka Shirish Desai … Applicant versus Daksha Jitendra Shah And Anr. … Respondents ---- None for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for the Respondent/ State. ----
Coram: Ashish S. Chavan, J. Date: 16th September, 2026. P.C.:
1. By way of this revision application, the Applicant has challenged
order dated 6th September, 2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 26th Court, Borivali, Mumbai, allowing the Respondent __________________________________________________ 16th September, 2026 SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Date: 2026.09.17 18:48:15 +0530
sg 28.revn200-18.docx No.1 to reside in the flat at MHADA.
2. Since institution of this application, neither the Counsel for the Applicant nor the Applicant sought circulation of the application or pressed for the reliefs sought for in the application.
3. It is evident from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in prosecuting the revision application, which is pending since 2018. In view thereof, the revision application along with accompanying applications, if any, are dismissed for non-prosecution. (Ashish S. Chavan, J.) __________________________________________________ 16th September, 2026