Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3742 (BOM)

SUPRIYA ROHAN GHARAT v. DIVYA DEEPAK PUSALKAR AND ORS

REVN/80/2018 · 2026-09-16

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

sg 26.revn80-18.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Revision Application No.80 of 2018 Supriya Rohan Gharat … Applicant versus Divya Deepak Pusalkar And Ors. … Respondents ---- None for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for the Respondent/ State. ---- Coram: Ashish S. Chavan, J. Date: 16th September, 2026. P.C.: 1. By way of this revision application, the Applicant, who happens to be the original complainant/Prosecutrix, has challenged the judgment and order dated 27th October, 2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Alibag, inter alia acquitting the Respondents. 2. On 23rd January, 2020, this Court had issued notice to the Respondents made returnable on 5th March, 2020, subject to the Applicant furnishing spare copies of the application. Subsequent noting indicates that since the Advocate for the Applicant had not __________________________________________________ 16th September, 2026 SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Date: 2026.09.17 18:48:14 +0530 sg 26.revn80-18.docx supplied spare copies, hence notice could not be issued to the Respondents. The same situation continues till date. No effort has been made by the Applicant or his Counsel to obtain circulation of the application or seek any relief as prayed for. 3. It is evident from the conduct of the Applicant that the Applicant is not desirous of prosecuting the revision application. In view thereof, the revision application stands dismissed for non- prosecution. (Ashish S. Chavan, J.) __________________________________________________ 16th September, 2026