Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3729 (BOM)

SUVARNA JALINDER BHOSALE AND ORS. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

WP/4188/2018 · 2026-09-15

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25-WP-4188-2018 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4188 OF 2018 Suvarna Jalinder Bhosale and others … Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary and others … Respondents ________________________ Mr. Vishwajit V. Nalawade i/b Mr. Milind Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. R.P. Kadam, A.G.P, for Respondent – State. _________________________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 15, 2026 P.C.: 1. By the present Writ Petition, the Petitioners are seeking following reliefs; “a. To quash and set aside the impugned advertisement dated 26th March, 2018 and 27th March, 2018 issued by the Respondent No. 2 i.e. the District Magistrate and District Collector, Sangli, in respect of Special Assistant Public Prosecutors in Sangli District; 1/2 shailaja SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Digitally signed by SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2026.09.16 14:44:19 +0530 25-WP-4188-2018 (C).docx b. To protect the services of the Petitioners and other Special Assistant Public Prosecutors appointed in Sangli District till the appointment of the Regular Assistant Public Prosecutors through MPSC;”. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that the Petition has become infructuous, inasmuch as the term of appointment of the Petitioners as “Regular Assistant Public Prosecutors” has expired. 3. In view of the above, the Petition is disposed of as infructuous. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.] 2/2 shailaja