Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3727 (BOM)

MR. KHILARE AMBADAS VASANT v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

CAW/1083/2018 · 2026-09-15

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 5caw1083.18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1083 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION ST NO. 17852 OF 2017 Mr. Khilare Ambadas Vasant ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary And Ors. …..Respondents Ms. Ketki Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. Madhav Chavan, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl. G. P. a/w Mr. Santosh A. Jadhav ‘B’ Panel Counsel for the State CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. This Application is filed for restoration of the Writ Petition which was dismissed for non-removal of office objection. 2. Heard both the learned Advocates for the parties. 3. In view of the averments made in the interim application, the Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause-4.1. 1 of 2 VISHAL RAM KAMBLE Digitally signed by VISHAL RAM KAMBLE Date: 2026.09.16 17:07:53 +0530 (2) 5caw1083.18 WRIT PETITION ST. NO.17852/2017 1. By consent, Writ Petition is taken up for hearing. 2. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has tendered an affidavit dated 04-06-2026 across the bar and same is taken on record. She seeks liberty to withdraw the Writ Petition and file appropriate proceeding. 3. Liberty as prayed for is granted. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ] [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.] VishalK/5caw1083.18 2 of 2