Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2018 DAILYLAW 3666 (BOM)
LALCHAND S/O RAMLAL SINGH, PROP. M/S AARTI ENGINEERING WORKS v. RATIRAM LAXMAN KAWLE
CAW/2891/2018 · 2026-09-08
body2018
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3666 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3666 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27 wp 454-2018.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2891 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 454 OF 2018 Lalchand S/o Ramlal Singh, Prop. M/s Aarti Engineering Works VERSUS Ratiram Laxman Kawle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri P.D. Meghe, Advocate for petitioner Shri Y.M. Raut, Advocate h/f M Kalyani Joshi, Advocate (appointed) for respondent No.1(a) to 1(e) CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 08.09.2026
1. By this application, the petitioner is seeking amendment to the petition. According to him, this amendment is necessary to decide the issue involved in the present matter. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.
2. Necessary amendment be carried out within one week.
3. After amendment is carried out, the respondent is at liberty to file the counter affidavit, if any, if so desired.
4. List this matter after three weeks.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare
Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/09/2026 19:33:27