MALLINATH S/O. TAMANAPPA CHAMARGOAL v. NIRMALA W/O. HARIDAS MANE AND ANR
APEAL/1659/2019 · 2026-09-07
Criminal Appealbody2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3655 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3655 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1/2 17-ALP-53-2018 (CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 53 OF 2018 Mallinath S/o. Tamanappa Chamargoal …...Applicant VERSUS Nirmala W/o Haridas Mane And Anr. …...Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1659 OF 2019 Mallinath S/o. Tamanappa Chamargoal …........Appellant VERSUS Nirmala W/o. Haridas Mane And Anr. ….......Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Nikita Pandey i/b Mr. Samir Kumbhakoni, for Applicant/Appellant. Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, APP, for Respondent No.2 - State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 7th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.
1. Heard Ms. Nikita Pandey, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant and Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.2 – State.
2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantial relief:
“a) Leave to file appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 26/12/2017 passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Solapur in Criminal Appeal No.106 of 2016 may kindly be granted. Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.09.07 18:56:53 +0530
2/2 17-ALP-53-2018 (CR).DOC b) The Judgment and Order dated 26/12/2017 passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Solapur in Criminal Appeal No.106 of 2016 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the complaint of the present Applicant may kindly be allowed.”
3.
Ms. Nikita Pandey, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant, on instructions from Mrs. Chamargoal (wife of the Applicant), states that the sole Applicant/Appellant in the present proceedings has passed away. She, therefore, submits that the present Application and Appeal stand abated and request for disposal of the same as infructuous.
4. Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.2 – State, submits that, in view of the death of the sole Applicant/Appellant, the present Application and Appeal stand abated.
5. In view of the statement made by Ms. Nikita Pandey, learned Advocate for the Applicant / Appellant, the present Application and Appeal stand abated.
6. Application for leave to Appeal (Pvt.) No.53 of 2018 and Criminal Appeal No.1659 of 2019 are disposed of as infructuous.
( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum