901-CP-363-2018 (C).doc IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 363 OF 2018 Vishnu Dagdu Jagtap & Anr. ..… Petitioners VERSUS State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..… Respondents ... Mr. Umesh Kurund, (Through VC) Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent-State. … CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 2 SEPTEMBER 2026. P. C. : 1. Mr. Kurund, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner through Video Conferencing, seeks leave to withdraw the Contempt Petition, submitting that the entire amount towards pensionary benefits has been received by the Petitioner. He therefore submits that the contempt has been purged and that the Petitioner is not pressing the Contempt Petition any further. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of as not pressed. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Shubham 1 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.09.03 17:28:51 +0530