Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3594 (BOM)

SHRI.LAXMAN SITARAM KAYGUDE v. SHIR. APPA BAPU KANSE

SA/3/2018 · 2026-08-28

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Priyanka 30-SA-3-2018.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.3 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.478 OF 2017 Laxman Sitaram Kaygude & Ors ...Appellants V/s. Appa Bapu Kanse & Ors ...Respondents ________________ None for the Appellants. Mr. Rahul S. Kate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 28 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: 1) None had appeared on behalf of Appellant on 12 December 2017, when this Court proceeded to condone the delay in filing the Appeal. Thereafter, it appears that none has appeared in the Appeal during last 10 long years. The Appeal is pending since the year 2016 and cannot be kept pending forever. 2) It appears that, the Appellant has lost interest in prosecuting the Appeal. 3) The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. Page No. 1 of 2 28 August 2026 PRIYANKA MADHAVRAO KALE Digitally signed by PRIYANKA MADHAVRAO KALE Date: 2026.09.01 10:51:52 +0530 Priyanka 30-SA-3-2018.docx 4) In view of disposal of Second Appeal, Civil Application No.478 of 2017 does not survive and accordingly is disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 28 August 2026