SMT.SAROJ KAMLAKAR DHARMAMER (AND OTHER) LATE KAMLAKAR MAHADEV DHARMAMER AND OTHERS v. SHRI.RAVINDRA MORESHWAR DHARMAMER AND OTHERS
CAS/847/2018 · 2026-08-28
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3585 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3585 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Priyanka 28-SA(ST)-847-2018.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.847 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO.35559 OF 2017 Saroj Kamlakar Dharmamer Late Kamlakar Mahadev Dharmamer & Ors ... Applicants/Appellants V/s. Ravindra Moreshwar Dharmamer & Ors ...Respondents ________________ Mr. Saket Joshi i/by Mr. Nitin Gangal for Applicants/Appellants. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 28 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: 1) The Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 20 days. Respondents are duly served. However, none had appeared on behalf of Respondents. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant that the Appeal was in fact lodged within prescribed time. However, due to non-availability of certified copy of the Decree passed by the Appellate Court, the Registry has raised objection of delay of 20 days in filing of the Appeal. 2) Considering this position as well as the reasons pleaded in the Application, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay in filing the Page No.
1 of
2 28 August 2026 PRIYANKA MADHAVRAO KALE Digitally signed by PRIYANKA MADHAVRAO KALE Date: 2026.08.29 18:17:53 +0530
Priyanka 28-SA(ST)-847-2018.docx Appeal. The delay of 20 days in filing the Appeal is accordingly condoned. 3) Accordingly, the Civil Application is disposed of.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No.
2 of
2 28 August 2026