Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3569 (BOM)

PAMELA @ PAMA W/O. RAJ D MELLO AND OTHERS v. RAJ D MELLO S/O. ANTHONY D MELLO

APPLN/2211/2018 · 2026-08-25

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

*1* 952appln2211o18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2211 OF 2018 IN REVNST/224/2018 PAMELA @ PAMA W/O. RAJ D MELLO AND OTHERS VERSUS RAJ D MELLO S/O. ANTHONY D MELLO ... Advocate Al Amoodi A.M. h/f Shri Syed G.R., Advocate for the Applicants. ... CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 25 August 2026 P. C. :- 1. Learned advocate for the applicants fairly states that applicant No.1/ wife has passed away during pendency of this application and applicant Nos.2 and 3 have become major. As such, the instant matter has become infructuous. 2. Hence, the Criminal Application as well as the Criminal Revision Application are disposed of as infructuous. kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) 2026:BHC-AUG:38631