Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3549 (BOM)

LAXMAN KANHU KOLHE v. THAKSEN SITARAM KOLHE AND ORS.

WP/4993/2018 · 2026-08-18

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Megha 18_wp_4993_2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4993 OF 2018 Laxman Kanhu Kolhe ...Petitioner V/s. Thaksen Sitaram Kolhe and Ors. ...Respondents ________________ Mr. Aditya Mhaske i/b. Mr. Vijay Dighe for the Petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for Respondent Nos.2 to 6,11 and 12. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 18 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: 1) The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that he has no instructions to prosecute the Petition. 2) Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. In the event, the Petitioner is interested in prosecuting the Petition, he would be at liberty to apply for restoration of the same. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 1 of 1 18 August 2026 2026:BHC-AS:34298 Signed by: Megha S. Parab Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 20/08/2026 11:25:06