SMT.SUMITRA BHALCHANDRA PADOSKAR v. SHRI.SHASHANK VITTHAL PINGULKAR
SA/450/2018 · 2026-06-25
Vrushali V Joshi
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3503 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3503 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2-SA-450-2018 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 450 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1019 OF 2018 Sumitra Bhalchandra Padoskar .....Appellant Vs. Shashank Vitthal Pingulkar .....Respondent ..... None for the Appellant. Mr. Abhay S. Khandeparkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rushikesh G. Bhagat, i/b. Khandekar & Associate, Advocates for the Respondent. .....
CORAM: MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, DATED: 25th JUNE 2026 P.C.:-
1. It appears from the record that the present Second Appeal is of the year 2018. The Appellant remained absent on the last date of hearing and is absent today as well, though the Respondent is present. Since learned Counsel for the Appellant was not appearing, notice was issued to the Appellant. Despite due service of notice, the Appellant failed to appear.
2. Accordingly, by order dated 12th June 2026, the matter was
directed to be listed on today's board under the caption of Gaikwad RD 1/2
2-SA-450-2018 (C).doc
“Dismissal”. Even today, despite service, the Appellant remains absent. It appears that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal.
3. The Appeal stands dismissed in default.
4. In view of dismissal of Second Appeal, nothing survives for further consideration in the Civil Application pending therein and the same also stands disposed of.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) Gaikwad RD 2/2 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2026.06.29 19:57:17 +0530