1 of 2 937-CA.95.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2018 IN FAST/38498/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS SADU BALIRAM LALE ... Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Applicants-State. Mr. Gopal D. Kale, Advocate for the Respondent. ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2018 IN FAST/38498/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS SADU BALIRAM LALE … Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Applicants-State. Mr. Gopal D. Kale, Advocate for the Respondent. … AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.38498 OF 2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS SADU BALIRAM LALE … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 2nd JULY, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/State. 2. By this appeal, the Appellants are assailing the Judgment and award dated 18.03.2015 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior 2026:BHC-AUG:26463 2 of 2 937-CA.95.2018 Division, Omerga, District Osmanabad in LAR No.273/2013. 3. Learned AGP submits that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO. 4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef