YUNNUS KARIMSAB KAMBLE v. ATMARAM SHIVANNA HIRAPURE AND ANR.
ALP/114/2019 · 2026-06-12
Shri Sandesh D Patil
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3476 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3476 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
15. ALP 194-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO.114 OF 2019
Yunnus Karimsab Kamble .. Applicant Versus Atmaram Shivanna Hirapure & Anr. .. Respondents ….. Mr. Ramdas Hake Patil (Through V.C.) a/w Ms. Vaishnavi R. Gaikwad for the Applicant. Mr. Ashish A. Chavan i/b Mr. Raghvendra B. Kulkarni for the Respondent No.1. …..
CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
DATED : 12th JUNE 2026 P.C.:-
1. Mr. Ramdas Hake Patil, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that he would file an Appeal before the learned Sessions Court, as per the Judgment and Order passed in the matter of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran etc., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners, therefore, prays to withdraw the present Petition. At his request, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty to approach the Ld. Sessions Court. RaJesh Chittewan, PS 1/2
15. ALP 194-2018.doc
2. Needless to say that the time spent by the Petitioners in prosecuting before this Court would be considered by the learned Sessions Court while condoning the delay under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
3. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) RaJesh Chittewan, PS 2/2 RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Digitally signed by RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.06.15 10:22:11 +0530