MOHD MUQATSID AHMAD AND ORS v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER S.D.M. (SOUTH) GOVT. OF N.C.T DELHI AND ORS.
W.P.(C)/11412/2018 · 2026-02-17
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3437 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 3437 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11412/2018
MOHD MUQATSID AHMAD AND ORS .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.P. Sharma, Advocate
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER S.D.M. (SOUTH) GOVT. OF N.C.T DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Advocate for GNCTD with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R %
17.02.2026
1. By way of thepresent petition, the petitioner has sought certain reliefs:
“(i) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ under Article 226 &227 of the constitution of India thereby issuing time bound directions to the respondentsNos. l &2 the Deputy Commissioner/S.D.M.(South), SDM (South East) to implement the recovery orders dated 26.02.2016 (passed by the Employee's Compensation Commissioner South in favour of the petitioners i.e. Annexure A-1, Annexure A-2, Annexure A-3. Annexure A-4. Annexure A-5 respectively attached to the writ petition).
(ii) Cost of writ petition be awarded in favour of the petitioners. (iii)Pass such other order (s) as the hon'ble court may deem fit proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case explained above in the interest of justice.
2. Ms. Avni Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and 2 submits that only one property belonging to the respondent no. 3 was identified and the same has already been auctioned off. The bid price would be deposited before the Labour Commissioner. She submits that as per the affidavit filed by This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 12:32:16
respondent no. 3, no other property is available.
3. Keeping in view, the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of.
4. The petitioner would, however, be at liberty to seek its remedy in accordance with law. The bid amount as and when received by the Labour Commissioner be released to the petitioner.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 17, 2026 sn
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 12:32:16