Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3409 (DEL)

VIKRAM PRAKASH v. PARSHOTAM PARKASH & ANR

CRL.REV.P./388/2018 · 2026-02-16

Saurabh Banerjee

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 388/2018, CRL.M.A. 8351/2018, CRL.M.A. 8353/2018 VIKRAM PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: None versus PARSHOTAM PARKASH & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 16.02.2026 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that same was the position on 28.08.2024, 25.10.2024, 05.03.2025, 21.07.2025 and 06.10.2025. 2. It seems that the petitioner is no longer interest in pursuing with the present matter. 3. Accordingly, the present petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed in default and non-prosecution. SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 16, 2026/Ab This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:17:07