( 1 ) wp2801.18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 57 WRIT PETITION NO. 2801 OF 2018 RATNAMALA PRALHAD SALVE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. S.P.Dhoble, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Saie S. Joshi, AGP for the respondent-State. Mr.V.M. Vibhute, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. DATE : 28.01.2026 PC :- 01. Heard learned Advocates for the parties. 02. Prayer clause (B) of the petition reads as under:- “By issuing appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent authority may kindly be directed to decide the claim of the petitioner in view of the provisions of the government resolution dated 12th of March, 2008 and 13th of August, 2014 and thereby directed to the respondent authority to issue the appointment order in favour of the petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Sevika. For that purpose necessary directions may kindly be issued.” 03. Considering the prayer, this Court finds that the petition can be allowed in terms of the said prayer. 2026:BHC-AUG:3848-DB ( 2 ) wp2801.18 04. Therefore, this Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Needless to say that the respondents shall consider representation on its own merit and decide the same within eight weeks from today. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2026/Jan26/wp2801.18