Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3331 (BOM)

SHRI.RAJUL VRAJLAL VORA v. MR. MANOHAR MOTIRAM PATIL (DECEASED)

SA/448/2018 · 2026-08-19

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Renuka 6-SA-448-2018.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 448 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 657 OF 2017 Shri.Rajul Vrajlal Vora ...Appellant V/s. Mr. Manohar Motiram Patil (Deceased) ...Respondent ________________ Mr. Aditya Udeshi with Mr. Rahul Sanghvi i/b M/s Sanjay Udeshi and Co., for Appellant. Mr. Kishor Patil for Respondent Nos. 1/1 and ½. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 19 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: 1) The learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that parties have amicably resolved the disputes amongst them. Consent terms are tendered. Consent terms are signed by the Appellant, Respondent and by their respective Advocates. Signatories to the consent terms are personally present before the Court. They admit their signatures on the consent terms as well as the contents thereof. Consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Statements made in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. Page No. 1 of 2 19 August 2026 2026:BHC-AS:34296 Renuka 6-SA-448-2018.docx 2) Second Appeal is accordingly disposed of in view of the consent terms. 3) Civil Application is also disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 19 August 2026 Signed by: Renuka S Thakur Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 20/08/2026 11:14:29