194.18revn (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 194 OF 2018 MIRABAI W/O. DIPAK @ DILIP GHOLAP VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. Mr H. V. Tungar, Advocate for Applicant Ms B. B. Gunjal, APP for Respondent No.1 Ms Priyanka Kulkarni, Advocate h/f Mr Shrikant Kawde, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5 ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026 P. C. : 1. Learned Advocate Mr Tungar for the applicant fairly states that, earlier he had filed criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 09/08/2017, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class-7, Beed in RCC No.593/2010. However, subsequently, by virtue of the order of this Court dated 24/07/2018, this appeal came to be converted into criminal revision application. He further submits that the applicant is having remedy to file revision application before the learned Sessions Court as the impugned order was passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision 2026:BHC-AUG:37572 194.18revn (2) application with liberty to file revision application before the learned Sessions Court. However, he submits that, as there is delay in filing revision application before the learned Sessions Court, delay be directed to be considered. 2. In view of the above, this criminal revision application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as is prayed for. It is made clear that, as the applicant was pursuing the remedy of a revision application before this Court, the period shall be considered under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk