Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3290 (BOM)

MRS.MANISHA GANESH NAVTHARE NEE MS.MANISHA SHIVAJI LAGAD v. MR.GANESH SHANTARAM NAVTHARE

CAM/96/2018 · 2026-07-31

Smt Bharati Dangre, Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/1 1 FCA.80.2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2019 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2018 Manisha Ganesh Navthare Nee Ms.Manisha Shivaji Lagad .. Appellant Versus Ganesh Shantaram Navthare .. Respondent … Mr. Graham Francis i/by Mr. Vishwanath Talkute, for the Appellant. … CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 31st JULY, 2026 P.C:- 1. A praecipe is moved by the learned counsel for the Appellant for withdrawal of the Appeal. However, he requests that the Appellant wants to remain present at the time of withdrawal of the Appeal. Hence, he seeks an adjournment. However, we do not feel the presence of the Appellant is necessary. Therefore, in view of the instructions given to the learned counsel for the Appellant, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending Interim Applications also stand disposed off. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Rushikesh RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Date: 2026.08.04 13:34:23 +0530