Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3168 (BOM)

SHRI ANAND BABURAO PANDAGALE v. MR. RAJESH VALCHAND SHAH THRU. HIS C.A. MR. PAHLAJ BULCHAND NARSINGHANI AND ORS.

FA/997/2018 · 2026-03-04

Shri Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Civil Appealbody2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ppn 1 27. FA-997-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 997 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1894 OF 2018 Anand Baburao Pandagale ….Appellant/Applicant Versus Rajesh Valchand Shah, Through His C.A. Pahlaj Bulchand Narsinghani & Ors. .…Respondents __________________________________________________________________ None for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni i/by Mr. Suhas S. Ghorpade for Respondent No.1. __________________________________________________________________ CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J. DATED : 04th MARCH 2026 P. C. : 1. The learned counsel for the Respondent states that the appellant has passed away. Therefore, an order was passed on 4 February 2026 to serve the legal heirs of the appellant. 2. Mr. Ghorpade, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has filed affidavit of service in the registry. 3. Since there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant and the appellant having died, the appeal stands abated and is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, civil application also does not survive and is disposed of. [ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ] PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.03.04 17:34:19 +0530