Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 3164 (BOM)

SUSHILA ASHRU HINGE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/7203/2018 · 2026-02-27

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 928-WP.4529.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 WRIT PETITION NO. 4529 OF 2018 RAMESH UTTAM HINGE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Dattatraya R. Jayabhar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for Respondent-State. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7203 OF 2018 SUSHILA ASHRU HINGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Dattatraya R. Jayabhar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for Respondent-State. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Mr. Dattatraya R. Jayabhar, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the executions of both the Petitioners, i.e., Special Darkhast No.139 of 2012 and Regular Darkhast No.611 of 2012, were disposed of by the learned Executing Court on the ground that the First Appeal filed by the State Government was pending before this Court. 2. He further submits that the said First Appeal filed by the 2026:BHC-AUG:8887 2 of 2 928-WP.4529.2018 State Government has now been dismissed. Therefore, liberty be granted to the Petitioner to file fresh applications in both the execution proceedings. 3. In view thereof, the present petitions are disposed of with liberty as prayed. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef