34.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 34 WRIT PETITION NO. 2319 OF 2018 Sadashiv Ambadas Gaike VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ….. Mr. V. D. Sapkal (Senior Advocate), Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for the Respondents – State ….. CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 24.03.2026 PER COURT : 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, due to the passage of time, the matter has become infructuous. 2. In view thereof, nothing survives for further consideration in the petition, and accordingly, the same stands disposed of as infructuous. 3. Pending civil application(s), if any, stand disposed of. [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.] Sameer/March-2026 1 2026:BHC-AUG:12679