IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.355 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3067 of 2012 ====================================================== Bhola Shankar Singh S/o Late Shyamdeo Singh, Resident of Village- Khapura, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Administrator Sri Ram Kishore Mishra and Or 2. Sri Anand Kumar Chaudhary, the Chief of Operation, B.S.R.T.C., Birchand Patel Path, Pariwahan Bhawa null null 3. Sri Anand Kumar Chaudhary, the Financial Advisor-cum-Chief Account Officer, Bihar State Road Transp null null 4. Sri Sumit Kumar, the Chief Mechanical Engineer, B.S.R.T.C. Birchand Patel Path, Pariwahan Bhawan, P 5. Sri Anand Kumar Chaudhary, the Chief Account Officer, B.S.R.T.C. Pariwahan Bhawan, Patna, Bihar. 6. Sri Arvind Kumar, the Divisional Manager, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna Division, P ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jainendra Kr. Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 7 18-08-2026 This Court vide order dated 15.02.2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3067 of 2012 has pased the following order: “Let the petitioner filed a representatin supported by all relevant documents in his possessin together with a copy of the present order for payment of dues constituting the post retiral dues within five weeks whereafter the said respondent (Chief of Administratin of the Corporation) shall examine the said claim of the petitioner in accordance Patna High Court MJC No.355 of 2018(7) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 with law and authorize all admissible dues in favour of the petitioner and/or any other heir of the deceased employee found entitled to receive such benefits. Such decisin must be taken by the said respondent within three months from the date of receipt/productin of a copy of this order alongwith the representation.” 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party submits that pursuant to the said order, the petitioner had filed a representation and the same was disposed of vide memo no. 1465 dated 12.04.2018. 3. Having regard to the same, the contempt stands closed however liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the said order, if he is so advised. Gauravkr/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U